Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 F.2d 899 - Figge Auto Co. v. Taylor

Figge Auto Co. v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

325 F.2d 899 · 1964

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
November 2007
most recently cited

29 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2007 · most notably Wright v. Farmers Co-Op (1980), Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc. (1976)

29 federal appellate ·

13019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hanson v. Ford Motor Co. · Simrell Et Ux. v. Eschenbach · Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance v. Wright · Fort Dodge Hotel Co. of Fort Dodge v. Bartelt · Glawe v. Rulon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the exceptional case where the error has seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(n)o party may assign as error the giving or failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.