Howard’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2009
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States · Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co. · Territo v. United States · Magenau v. Aetna Freight Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“proceed in such manner as the rules of civil procedure prescribe”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“failure to comply with the applicable rules of civil procedure”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.