Kildare’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably 482 F. Supp. 2d 1172 - Jing Li v. Chertoff (2007), Hall v. Sebelius (2009)
7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zinermon v. Burch · Maine v. Thiboutot · Heckler v. Ringer · Bowen v. City of New York · Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to find a specific policy to disregard the regulations from these individual errors. Without a specific policy, and with only allegations of idiosyncratic individual errors, whether the State Defendants committed the alleged errors must be determined in the context of each individual Appellant's proceedings before the state agency, and thus the Appellants' claims are inextricably intertwined with their claims for benefits. Irreparability 20 A colorable claim of irreparable harm is one that is not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kildare v. Saenz“for making the SSDI/SSI disability determination. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 , 416.920; City of New York, 476 U.S. at 470 , 106 S.Ct. 2022 (citations omitted). The regulations have detailed rules and standards for state agencies to use in obtaining medical evidence for the initial disability determination. 20 C.F.R. pts. 404, 416. For example, the regulations require state agencies to develop each claimant's complete medical history and make”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kildare v. Saenz“Briggs, 886 F.2d at 1140; see also Johnson, 2 F.3d at 922 (holding that the economic hardship of plaintiffs who received reduced SSI benefits was sufficient to meet the requirement of irreparability). Here, Appellants adequately allege economic hardship, such as subsistence on General Assistance and food stamps, lack of medical insurance, and homelessness. Futility 21”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kildare v. Saenz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.