Lawrence v. Cohn’s Empirical Analysis
325 F.3d 141 · 2003
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably ECA & Local 134 Ibew Joint Pension Trust v. Jp Morgan Chase Co. (2009), New Orleans Employees' Retirement System v. Omnicom Group, Inc. (2010)
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson · Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company · Rubin v. United States · Meinhard v. Salmon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“establish that `the defendant, in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, made a materially false statement or omitted a material fact, with scienter, and that the plaintiffs reliance on the defendant's action caused injury to the plaintiff.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the plaintiff must be an actual purchaser or seller of a security.” Lawrence v. Cohn, 325 F.3d 141, 147 (2d Cir.2003) (citing Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores, 421 U.S. 723, 730-31 , 95 S.Ct. 1917 , 44 L.Ed.2d 539 (1975)). Plaintiff fulfills this requirement. (See Compl. ¶ 64.) Second,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.