TFWS, Inc. v. Schaefer’s Empirical Analysis
325 F.3d 234 · 2003
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2023
8 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. · Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. · Zenaida Garc a-Ayala v. Lederle Parenterals Inc et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the post-and-hold system, liquor wholesalers are required to file price schedules and proposed price changes that are made available to their competitors. By the fifth of each month wholesalers must post with the Comptroller a schedule of any price changes they intend to make for the following month. The Comptroller then makes these postings available to other wholesalers, who are given until the thirteenth of the month to file amended price schedules for new brands or new sizes of existing brands.... [W]hen one wholesaler posts a price change for an existing product, a competitor may match that price in a regular filing the following month. Under the post-and-hold system wholesalers must sell to retailers at the prices established in the posted schedule for at least the month following the posting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.