Herbert v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
325 F.3d 68 · 2003
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Twum v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2005), El Moraghy v. Ashcroft (2003)
40 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Ungar v. Sarafite · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sharma v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Nazarova v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“treat[ing] the findings and conclusion of the IJ as the Board's own opinion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be ordered removed in absentia if the [INS] establishes by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the [required] written notice was so provided and that the alien is removable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kaweesa v. R Gonzles“totality of the circumstances must be considered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kaweesa v. R Gonzles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.