Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 F.3d 690 - Barron v. A

Barron v. A’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably In the Matter of Bobby Cahill Janice Cahills Walker & Patterson Pc, Perry v. Ssb

9 federal appellate ·

270200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 328

Relies on Koon v. United States · Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.) · Fender Transamerican Natural Gas Corporation v. Zapata Partnership Ltd · National Gypsum Company Donaldson Lufkin Jenrette Securities Corporation v. National Gypsum Company · Texas Securities Inc Bruce v. James Cunningham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he court may allow compensation different from the compensation provided under such terms and conditions after the conclusion of such employment, if such terms and conditions prove to have been improvident in light of developments not capable of being anticipated at the time of the fixing of such terms and conditions.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the terms and conditions prove to have been improvident in light of developments not capable of being anticipated at the time of the fixing of such terms and conditions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the bankruptcy court ... [to] determine[] whether developments, which made the approved fee plan improvident, had been incapable of anticipation at the time the award was approved.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.