Jackson v. Geren

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2009

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-05-13

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2010

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2009-05-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Dr. Joan E. Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Honorable Peter Geren, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, on her claim for retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Geren, No. 8:07-cv-00851-AW (D.Md. Nov. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.