¶1 W. Charles Fletcher, appointed counsel for Alan Eason in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Eason’s revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED. Eason’s request for appointment of appellate counsel is accordingly DENIED AS MOOT.
325 F. App'x 868
United States v. Alan Eason
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided May 7, 2009
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-05-07
<p>Non-Argument Calendar.</p>
Relies on Anders v. California
Decided 2009-05-07