Gordon v. Leatherman’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Wisconsin v. Constantineau · Zwickler v. Koota · Wieman v. Updegraff · Moody v. Flowers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the recall procedure is available only if the charges presented in the petition relate to: (a) the official's conduct in office, and the ground of the action must be something stronger than a belief; (b) 'alleged ill-advised and possibly unlawful acts which the affiants * * * say resulted in a depreciation of the city treasury'; and (c) something other than dissatisfaction with the manner in which the official exercised his judgment on a matter before him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gordon v. Leatherman“Any member of the Board of County Commissioners or the Sheriff or any Constable may be removed from office by the electors of the county, district, or municipality by which he was chosen. The procedure on a recall petition shall be identical with that for an initiatory or referendary petition, except that:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gordon v. Leatherman“8. Any vacancy created by recall in the offices of Sheriff or Constables shall be filled for the remaining term by appointment by the Board of County Commissioners or the Board may require the office to be filled at the next regular election or at a special election called for that purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gordon v. Leatherman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.