325 F. Supp. 2d 373 - United States v. Einstman’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993) · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Mistretta v. United States · Schriro Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Summerlin · State Oil Co. v. Khan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in Blakely would appear to alter this result; the restitutionary scheme is not part of the USSG and does not include anything like the ‘relevant statutory maximum’ that was decreed in Blakely . It appears that Congress wanted district courts to set the amount of restitution in the old-fashioned, pre-USSG way .... I see no constitutional infirmity in that ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.