Bauer v. Devos’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 20 U.S.C. § 1070 (Persian Gulf Conflict Higher Education Assistance Act) · 20 U.S.C. § 1089 · 20 U.S.C. § 1098A · 20 U.S.C. § 6571 · 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All regulations pertaining to [Title IV] that are promulgated after October 7, 1998, shall be subject to a negotiated rulemaking (including the selection of the issues to be negotiated), unless the Secretary determines that applying such a requirement with respect to given regulations is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest (within the meaning of section 553(b)(3)(B) of Title 5), and publishes the basis for such determination in the Federal Register at the same time as the proposed regulations in question are first published.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“about the validity of the Borrower Defense Regulations; the delay would not cause the government any significant harm; and the Department was, in any event, reconsidering the regulations, and the delay would minimize confusion while that process proceeded. Id. at 106-07 , at (citing Section 705 Stay, 82 Fed. Reg. at 27,621 ). The Court concluded that none of the reasons withstood APA scrutiny. Id. The first rationale was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“involving enforcement decisions, allocation of lump sum appropriations, or other 'categories of administrative decisions that courts traditionally have regarded as 'committed to agency discretion.' ' " Id. (quoting Lincoln v. Vigil , 508 U.S. 182 , 191, 113 S.Ct. 2024 , 124 L.Ed.2d 101 (1993) ). According to the Secretary, this is one of those "rare instances”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.