Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 GAAPP 145 - Kelley v. Cooper

Kelley v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on KEN-MAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Bowen · Mallen v. Mallen · 168 Ga. App. 218 - Jeff Goolsby Homes Corp. v. Smith · ALDWORTH CO., INC. v. England · 195 Ga. App. 529 - Myers v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n order to recover for fraud, a plaintiff must prove that actual damages, not simply nominal damages, flowed from the fraud alleged. The expression “actual damages” is not necessarily limited to pecuniary loss, or loss of ability to earn money. General damages are those which the law presumes to flow from any tortious act, and they may be awarded on a fraud claim. Wounding a man’s feelings is as much actual damage as breaking his limbs. Injury to reputation is a personal injury, and personal injury damages can be recovered in a fraud action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.