Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 GAAPP 777 - King v. State

King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hayes v. State · Battles v. State · Marriott v. State · 247 Ga. App. 775 - Turner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. In determining that question, we consider the inferences that can be logically derived from the evidence presented at trial. As long as there is some competent evidence, even though contradicted, to support each fact necessary to make out the State’s case, the jury’s verdict will be upheld.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.