State Ex Rel. Strohfeld v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently February 1989 · most notably State v. McGee (1935), Rogers v. Thompson (1954)
1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Downs v. Horton · Toeneboehn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. · Peterson v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co. · Barz v. Fleischmann Yeast Co. · Sanford v. Van Pelt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule may be stated in this way: Where a party asserts the affirmative of a proposition and proof of it is necessary to sustain his point, the truth and weight of his evidence, though uncontradicted, is for the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cieslinski v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.