State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably State v. Barnes (1997), State v. Trull (1998)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hennis · State v. Johnson · State v. Jerrett · State v. Richardson · State v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“frequently ... held that when, as here, evidence is admitted over objection, but the same or similar evidence has been previously admitted or is later admitted without objection, the benefit of the objection is lost.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he trial court ha[s] no authority to increase the number of peremptory challenges . . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Smith“In State v. Richardson, 308 N.C. 470 , 302 S.E.2d 799 , this Court stated that “the most persuasive evidence that the pretrial publicity was not prejudicial or inflammatory” was the potential jurors’ responses to questions asked during the voir dire hearing conducted to select the jury. 308 N.C. at 480 , 302 S.E.2d at 805 . . . . Moreover, we stated in Richardson that the most important evidence that the pretrial publicity about the case was not prejudicial was that each juror selected to hear the case “unequivocally answered in the affirmative when asked if they could set aside what they had previously heard about defendant’s case and determine defendant’s guilt or innocence based solely on the evidence introduced at trial.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Madric
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.