Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 N.C. 389 - State v. Whiteside

State v. Whiteside’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably State v. Collins (1993), State v. Grooms (2000)

70 state decisions

3601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · California v. Curry · Reading Co. v. CJI Industries, Inc. · Searle v. Simon · State v. Bullard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Relevant evidence' means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence is relevant if it has any logical tendency, however slight, to prove a fact in issue in the case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime punishable by more than 60 days confinement shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination of thereafter. (d) Evidence of juvenile adjudications is generally not admissible under this rule. The court may, however, in a criminal case allow evidence of a juvenile adjudication of a witness other than the accused if conviction of the offense would be admissible to attack the credibility of an adult and the court is satisfied that admission in evidence is necessary for a fair determination of the issue of guilt or innocence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.