325 N.J. Super. 184 - State v. Fulston’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · California v. ARC America Corp. · State v. Ramseur · Weichert v. United States · State v. Koedatich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the defendant offers proof of that kind exculpatorily, prejudice to the defendant is no longer a factor. More specifically, there is no danger that the jury will convict the defendant of the crime being tried merely because of his sordid, criminal past.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jolley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.