Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 NW2D 245 - Briese v. Briese

Briese v. Briese’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably Routledge v. Routledge (1985), Bullock v. Bullock (1984)

27 state decisions

220198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fischer v. Fischer · Ruff v. Ruff · Williams v. Williams · Bingert v. Bingert · Urlaub v. Urlaub

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Federal tax matters are generally not within the jurisdiction of the courts which have jurisdiction over domestic matters. Fraase v. Fraase, 315 N.W.2d 271, 278 (N.D.1982) (Sand, J., special concurrence) .... This court will not speculate as to the possible outcome of a federal tax matter over which we have no jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]here are no rigid rules for determining whether or not to award alimony and the amount of such an award. The determination of a just award is within the discretion of the trial court and will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “make such suitable allowances to the other party for support during life or for a shorter period as to the court may seem just, having regard to the circumstances of the parties respectively”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.