Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 N.W.2d 633 - Jones v. Fleischhacker

Jones v. Fleischhacker’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2017

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

1201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. · Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tapemark Co. · In Re Estate of Forsythe · Knox v. City of Granite Falls · Hardwick Ex Rel. Bartz v. Bublitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(w)henever any motor vehicle shall be operated within this state, by any person other than the owner, with the consent of the owner, express or implied, the operator shall in the case of accident, be deemed the agent of the owner of such motor vehicle in the operation thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It has now become axiomatic in this state that the sufficiency of the foundation to qualify a witness as an expert is a question left almost entirely to the trial court and we will not reverse unless it is clearly apparent that the trial court was wrong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.