Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 Pa. Super. 308 - Emerick v. Carson

325 Pa. Super. 308 - Emerick v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 363 Pa. Super. 247 - Bolus v. United Penn Bank (1987), 360 Pa. Super. 72 - Daniel Adams Associates, Inc. v. Rimbach Publishing, Inc. (1987)

55 state decisions

3901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School District · Mt. Lebanon v. County Board of Elections · 267 Pa. Super. 247 - Cusatis v. Reichert · 266 Pa. Super. 587 - Commonwealth v. Seville · Auerbach v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) If the identity of an expert witness is not disclosed in compliance with subdivision (a)(1) of this rule, he shall not be permitted to testify on behalf of the defaulting party at the trial of the action. However, if the failure to disclose the identity of the witness is the result of extenuating circumstances beyond the control of the defaulting party, the court may grant a continuance or other appropriate relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “obviously goes to the weight to be accorded to [the] testimony ... and not to its admissibility”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.