Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 S.C. 636 - State v. Blick

State v. Blick’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2013

5 state decisions

20199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Halper · United States v. Newby · State v. Thrift · United States v. Hedges · Patterson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of a prison disciplinary proceeding is to maintain institutional order rather than to prosecute criminal conduct. The adoption and execution of policies and practices necessary to preserve internal order and discipline, and to maintain institutional security in the prison are within the province and expertise of correctional officials.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.