325 So. 2d 14 - Dean v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2010
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 303 So. 2d 632 - Sullivan v. State · 63 So. 2d 339 - Kaminski v. State · Johnson v. State · 241 So. 2d 390 - Anderson v. State · 177 So. 2d 532 - State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... evidence [that a person refused to take such a test] is liable to be prejudicial and should be admitted only when clearly relevant and unmistakably nonprejudicial.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is illogical to say that because the judge did not redefine justifiable and excusable homicide as not constituting the crime of manslaughter, such would vitiate a verdict of first-degree murder. Such could have had no bearing upon the jury having reached a verdict of first degree murder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.