Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 So. 2d 255 - State v. Bryant

325 So. 2d 255 - State v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2011

16 state decisions

11019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Furman v. Georgia · United States v. Robinson · Trop v. Dulles · United States v. Edwards · United States v. District Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o law shall subject any person. . . to cruel, excessive or unusual punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Declaration of Rights of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The prohibition against `excessive . . . punishment' makes a great change in the law and requires the courts to do justice in each case, regardless of any legislative assertion. This standard allows the courts to avoid strained interpretations of what is cruel and unusual punishment, in order to reach the sometimes more important question of whether the punishment does, in fact, fit the crime. For example, it is much easier to find that imposition of the death penalty is excessive as punishment for such crimes as rape and kidnapping than that it is cruel or unusual. . . . Mandatory penalties are particularly suspect because they frequently have no relation to the magnitude of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.