Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 U.S. 410 - Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.

Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.’s Empirical Analysis

325 U.S. 410 · 1945

Citation profile

3,939
cited by 3,939 later decisions
88
cited 88 times by the Supreme Court
34
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

1,724 federal appellate · 405 district · 280 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3,939 later decisions (88 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2025 · most notably Udall v. Tallman (1965), Auer v. Robbins (1997)

1,724 federal appellate · 405 district · 280 state decisions — followed in 34 states

8510194519501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Yakus v. United States · Lockerty v. Phillips · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Cleveland v. United States

Cited together with Udall v. Tallman · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Larionoff · Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala · Auer v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,939 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.”
    240 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “countless explanations and interpretations given to inquirers affected by this type of maximum price regulation”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the plain words of the regulation and any relevant interpretations of the [agency].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.