Byrd v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp. · Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Co. · McCrory v. Johnson · 51 Ark. App. 4 - Kinkead v. Union National Bank · Norton v. Norton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services to the client (1) between himself or his representative and his lawyer or his lawyer’s representative, (2) between his lawyer and the lawyer’s representative, (8) by him or his representative or his lawyer or a representative of the lawyer to a lawyer or a representative of a lawyer representing another party in a pending action and concerning a matter of common interest therein, (4) between representatives of the client or between the client and a representative of the client, or (5) among lawyers and their representatives representing the same client.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buckley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.