Isbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Bell v. State (1998), Marts v. State (1998)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Fulminante · Michigan v. Long · Bennett v. State · Davis v. State · Pyle v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(g)(2)(A) No law enforcement officer shall question a juvenile who has been taken into custody for a delinquent act or criminal offense if the juvenile has indicated in any manner that he: (i) Does not wish to be questioned; (ii) Wishes to speak with a parent or guardian or to have a parent or guardian present; or (iii) Wishes to consult counsel before submitting to any questioning. (B) Any waiver of the right to counsel by a juvenile shall conform to subsection (f) of this section.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. State · Matthews v. State“When the testimony was presented, counsel for the defense merely said “objection.” The Prosecutor responded that he did not know of any basis for the objection other than that the defense did not want to hear the evidence. The Court said “overruled,” and counsel did not mention a ground of objection or any authority for it. The Trial Court was thus not informed as to the nature of the objection. Absent a specific objection informing the Trial Court of the nature of the error alleged on appeal, we do not reverse. Reams v. State, 322 Ark. 336 , 909 S.W.2d 324 (1995); Childress v. State, 322 Ark. 127 , 907 S.W.2d 718 (1995).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marts v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.