Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 ARK 277 - Holt v. Priest

Holt v. Priest’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. McCuen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence upon issues of fact will be taken by a master to be appointed by the court. As a condition to the appointment of a master, the court may require both parties to file a bond for costs to be approved by the clerk. Upon the filing of the master’s findings, the parties shall file briefs as in other cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.