Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

326 Ark. 468

Willingham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 28, 1996

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1996-10-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2004

1 state decisions

Relies on Rogers v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-10-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Appellant O.C. Willingham, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

¶2 The motion admits that the record was not timely filed, but neither appellant nor his current attorney admit fault. As such, the motion for rule on the clerk does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979). If appellant’s current attorney, Charles L. Honey, will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

/326/ark/468 · .json · Public domain