¶1 Hall petitions for rehearing and cites U.S. v. Gaudin, _ U.S. _, 115 S.Ct. 2310 (1995), for the proposition that our decision improperly failed to entertain the jury-instruction issue raised herein as a structural error. We deny Hall’s petition by pointing out that Gaudin does not hold that an erroneous jury instruction which omits an element of the government’s burden of proof compels a finding of prejudicial error. See also California v. Roy, _ U.S. _, (No. 95-2025, Nov. 4, 1996).
326 Ark. 823
Hall v. State
Decided December 9, 1996
Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1996-12-09
Relies on United States v. Gaudin
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-12-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2018
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →