Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

326 Ark. 912

Noble v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 16, 1996

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1996-12-16

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2015

4 state decisions

Relies on Rogers v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-12-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Petitioner, Sherman Noble, by his attorney, Gail Anderson, has filed a motion for belated appeal. The attorney has acknowledged that it was her responsibility to give a timely notice of appeal.

¶2 We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979)(per curiam). Accordingly, we grant the motion and direct that a copy of this opinion be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

/326/ark/912 · .json · Public domain