In Re Parrish’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Raleigh v. Illinois Department of Revenue · 26 663 74447 Allegheny International Inc · Reed First Texas Savings Association Inc 580-0018 580-0019 580-0025 v. D Reed D · In Re Cluff · United States v. Trogdon (In Re Trogdon)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a satisfactory explanation for why its most recent figures should be believed, given that they are based on calculations that the court has found do not accurately reflect the account activity”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Brown“[a] claimant who is a servicer must, in addition to establishing the rights of the holder, identify itself as an authorized agent for the holder”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Nosek“fell woefully short of proving the amount of its claim[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.