Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 Conn. 65 - State v. Seeley

State v. Seeley’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Decaro · State v. Trine · State v. Perkins · State v. Rutan · State v. Henderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a motion for [a judgment of acquittal] at the close of the state's evidence is denied, a defendant may not secure appellate review of the trial court's ruling without [forgoing] the right to put on evidence in his or her own behalf. The defendant's sole remedy is to remain silent and, if convicted, to seek reversal of the conviction because of insufficiency of the state's evidence. If the defendant elects to introduce evidence, the appellate review encompasses the evidence in toto.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.