Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 F.2d 104 - Horton v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

Horton v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

326 F.2d 104 · 1964

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
June 1989
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 1989 · most notably United States v. Lease (1965), Harris v. Smith (1967)

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

170196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. · Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co. · Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. · General Reinsurance Corp. v. Commissioner · Knell v. Feltman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The liability of Moore-McCormack to Horton is based wholly upon the injuries inflicted on Horton by Rivera. There is no evidence which would support any liability of Moore-McCormack which does not arise from Rivera's attack on Horton. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in hiring Rivera, in laxity of discipline which permitted this attack on Horton and in failing to halt that attack.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “implied agreement * * * to perform his duties in a proper and seamanlike manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.