Goldammer v. Fay’s Empirical Analysis
326 F.2d 268 · 1964
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2006 · most notably Baird Corp. v. United States (1983), Otero Mills, Inc. v. Security Bank & Trust (In Re Otero Mills, Inc.) (1982)
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Virginian Ry Co v. System Federation No 40 · Whittenberg v. Williams · Dutch Maid Bakeries, Inc. v. Schleicher · Mabray v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““From the record it appears that an injunction would not be of any benefit to the Goldammers [the employers] and would result in serious detriment to the Fays [the employees]. We agree with the trial court that the evidence is not sufficient to establish that the Goldammers suffered any substantial injury from the Fay restaurant entitling them to damages, or that they would benefit from an injunction, the enforcement of which would be unjust and inequitable.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.