Abramson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
326 F.2d 565 · 1964
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 1999
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 26 U.S.C. § 7237 · 26 U.S.C. § 7607
Relies on Goldman v. United States · Union Transfer Co. v. United States · United States v. Shavin · Dailey v. United States · Tillman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* ⅜ * phg indictment or information shall state for each count the official or customary citation of the statute, rule, regulation or other provision of law which the defendant is alleged therein to have violated. Error in the citation or its omission shall not be ground for dismissal of the indictment or information ■or for reversal of a conviction if the error or omission did not mislead the •defendant to his prejudice. ■”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Theodore v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.