Wabisky v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
326 F.2d 658 · 1963
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Quercia v. United States · Billeci v. United States · Wabisky v. D. C. Transit System, Inc. · Wabisky v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'use great care that an expression of opinion upon the evidence should be so given as not to mislead, and especially that it should not be one-sided.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is not arbitrary and uncontrolled, but judicial, to be exercised in conformity with the standards governing the judicial office,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.