Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

326 F.2d 971

Docket No. 9167.

Craig v. Texaco, Inc.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 9, 1964. Decided Jan. 22, 1964.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-01-22

2 counsel of record

Relies on Freeling v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation · Craig v. Texaco, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-01-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1992

13 federal appellate ·

501964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

George Rountree, Jr., Wilmington, N.C. (Rountree & Clark, Wilmington, N.C., on brief), for appellant.

Lonnie B. Williams and Alan A. Marshall, Wilmington, N.C. (Poisson, Marshall, Barnhill & Williams, Wilmington, N.C., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This is an action involving defendant's termination of a contract and lease which, it is claimed, were procured through fraud and misrepresentation on the part of the defendant. Upon the record before it, the District Court found that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. We find no error. D.C., 218 F.Supp. 789.

¶2

Affirmed.

/326/f2d/971 · .json · Public domain