Hooper v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
326 F.2d 982 · 1964
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably McCarty v. McCarty (1981), Augenblick v. United States (1967)
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 802 · 10 U.S.C. § 876
Relies on Commissioner v. Sunnen · Reid v. Covert · United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Durfee v. Duke · Baldwin v. Ionwa State Traveling Men's Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... application of res judicata and collateral estoppel ... is a judicially developed restriction invoked in the name of public policy requiring that a litigant be given only one day in court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stall v. Bourne“the salary he received was not solely recompense for past services, but a means devised by Congress to assure his availability and preparedness in future contingencies”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McCarty v. McCarty
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.