Poole v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Spivey v. State · State v. Eubanks · State v. Evans · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in indictment was generic and should be defined with greater specificity); State v. Tate , 262 Ga.App. 311 , 314 (2) (b), 585 S.E.2d 224 (2003) (finding that defendant filed special demurrer to terroristic threats count on ground that indictment failed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“waived his right to seek greater specificity in the form of the indictment, and he cannot now resurrect his challenge to the indictment in the guise of a motion in arrest of judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“challenges the validity of an indictment by asserting that the substance of the indictment is legally insufficient to charge any crime,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.