Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 MONT 7 - In re A.R.

In re A.R.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Marriage of Nikolaisen · In re K.C.H. · In Re the Marriage of Kukes · In re D.T.H. · Matter of Inquiry Into J.L.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review a district court’s decision to terminate parental rights to determine whether the court abused its discretion. We review a district court’s specific findings to determine whether they are clearly erroneous. A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is not supported by substantial evidence, if the court misapprehended the effect of the evidence or if, upon reviewing the record, this Court is left with the definite and firm conviction that the district court made a mistake. In reviewing a district court’s conclusions of law, we determine if they are correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.