Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 N.C. 231 - Harwood v. Johnson

Harwood v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Shaw v. Stroud (1994), Meyer v. Walls (1997)

40 state decisions

270199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Board of Pardons v. Allen · Presnell v. Pell · Pharr v. Garibaldi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies, a suit cannot be maintained in the superior court against defendants in their official capacities. The decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of the complaint as to the Secretary of the Department of Correction, the Chairman and Members of the Parole Commission, and the Superintendent of the Rowan County Prison Unit, in their official capacities, is affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the complaint is sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss[,] [i]t remains to be determined, upon summary judgment, or at trial, whether plaintiff can forecast or prove”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.