Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 Or. 267 - In Re Gallagher

In Re Gallagher’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was well familiar with the high standards of behavior that the privilege of judicial service demands”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"1. failed to observe high standards of conduct so that integrity and impartiality of the judiciary are preserved and failed to act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the judiciary and the judicial process in violation of JR 1-101(A); "2. engaged in conduct that reflects adversely on the judge's character, temperament and fitness to serve as a judge in violation of JR 1-101(C); "3. while a proceeding was pending in a court within his jurisdiction, made public comment that might reasonably be expected to affect the outcome and impair the fairness of the proceeding in violation of JR 2-103; "4. failed to be faithful to the law and decide matters on the basis of the facts and applicable law in violation of JR 2-107; "5. failed to be patient, dignified and courteous to a litigant and a lawyer in violation of JR 2-110(A); and "6. acted in a way that he knows, or reasonably should know, would be perceived by a reasonable person as biased and prejudiced toward the litigant and the lawyer in violation of JR 2-110(B)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “adversely affect[ed] the public's perception of the integrity and dignity of the judiciary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In re Day

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.