State v. Fair’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The indictment shall contain substantially the following: "* * * * * "(7) A statement of the acts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended[.]"”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stout“(a) Any conduct that constitutes a crime, as defined in ORS 161.515, under any of the following provisions of the Oregon Revised Statutes:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stout“enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity consisting of theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stout
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.