Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 Pa. 209 - Thompson v. Fox

Thompson v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

132
cited by 132 later decisions
13
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 93 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Hilbert v. Roth (1959), Brown v. Pittsburgh (1962)

21 federal appellate · 93 state decisions — followed in 13 states

320193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Milks v. McIver · Mason v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc. · Feinstone v. Allison Hospital, Inc. · Purchase v. Seelye · Seither v. Philad. Traction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nor is it material whether the tort-feasors involved committed a joint tort or concurrent or successive torts, because the principle which underlies the rule is that the injured person is given a legal remedy only to obtain compensation for the damage done to him, and when that compensation has been received from any of the wrongdoers, his right to further remedy is at an end.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.