Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

326 S.C. 88

In re Bodiford

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 17, 1997

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1997-04-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2002

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-04-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has filed a petition seeking to have respondent transferred to disability inactive status and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent’s clients pursuant to Paragraph 33, of former Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent consents to the relief sought by the Board.

¶3IT IS ORDERED that respondent is placed on disability inactive status until further order of this Court.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Coiinne B. Cannon, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating accounts(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Ms. Cannon shall take action as required by Paragraph 33 to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Ms. Cannon may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating accounts(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain as are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

¶5This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of Harry Ennis Bodiford, Esquire, shall serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Corinne B. Cannon, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Ernest A. Finney, Jr. C.J.Jean H. Toal A.J.James E. Moore A.J.John H. Waller, Jr. A.J.E.C. Burnett, III A.J.
/326/sc/88 · .json · Public domain