326 So. 2d 165 - Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1994
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · 274 So. 2d 256 - Nelson v. State · 128 So. 2d 594 - Zirin v. Charles Pfizer & Co. · Scott v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial judge who previously sentenced a defendant to a term of years less than the maximum allowable by law, may, after a new trial wherein defendant is placed on probation, impose for violation of the terms of probation, any sentence up to the maximum which could have been originally imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“impose any sentence which it might have originally imposed before placing the probationer on probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.