Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

326 So. 2d 207

Hill v. Hill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 5, 1976

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1976-02-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1983

2 state decisions

Relies on 322 So. 2d 22 - Dinkel v. Dinkel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Each of the points presented by this appeal from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage were resolved by the learned trial judge and are supported by competent substantial evidence. While we probably would not have awarded the same amounts of alimony, child support and attorney’s fees as did the learned trial judge, we can not say that as a matter of law he abused his broad discretion. See Dinkel v. Dinkel, Fla.1975, 322 So.2d 22. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is

¶2Affirmed.

¶3Appellant’s application for attorney’s fees and costs incident to this appeal is denied.

BOYER, C. J., and SMITH, J., concur.RAWLS, J., dissents.
/326/so2d/207 · .json · Public domain