Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 So. 2d 364 - State v. Hampton

326 So. 2d 364 - State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2011

7 state decisions

3019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Mays · 283 So. 2d 753 - State v. Woods

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. Defendant did not take the stand otherwise in his own defense. A trial court has great discretion in permitting or refusing in-court experiments and demonstrations. Criteria for withholding permission include”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “considerations arising from the possible disruption of orderly and expeditious proceedings or from the lack of similarity between courtroom conditions and the actual conditions sought to be re-tested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.