326 So. 2d 565 - Ingram v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 1987
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Smith · Hooks v. State · Louisiana v. McIlhenny · 277 So. 2d 223 - Tabb v. Norred · State v. Cochran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[A] presumption of simulation arises when the party asserting the simulation produces evidence which creates a highly reasonable doubt or suspicion concerning the honesty or validity of the transaction. Such a showing establishes a prima facie case of simulation and the burden is thereby shifted to the defendants to demonstrate the validity of the transaction under attack. Smith v. Smith, 239 La. 688 , 119 So.2d 827 (La.1960); Teche Concrete, Inc. v. Moity, 168 So.2d 347 (La. App. 3rd Cir.1964), writ refused 247 La. 251 , 170 So.2d 509 ; Dare v. Myrick [ 226 La. 732 , 168 So.2d 845 ], supra; Laborde v. Dauzat, 158 So.2d 637 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1963), writ refused 245 La. 731 , 160 So.2d 595 ; Landry v. Landry, 140 So.2d 706 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1962); Howard v. Howard, 96 So.2d 345 (La.App.2nd Cir.1957)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The parties must produce proof that they are acting in good faith and establish the reality of the sale.” (Emphasis added)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““That possession is called precarious, which one enjoys by the leave of another and during his pleasure. The title which excludes the ownership, such as a lease, is also called precarious.” (Emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.